Talk:Gliese 581d/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 07:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While I would be like to review this, currently it fails criteria 5: " it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute." @MartinZ02: and @Aldaron: seem to have reverted each other a few times about a week ago over some content. Has there been an agreement on that in the last week? -- numbermaniac (talk) 07:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The edit war/content dispute has ended. MartinZ02 (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. -- numbermaniac (talk) 00:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Existence[edit]

"In 2015, a study by Dr Guillem Anglada-Escudé concluded that the planet does exist." Are we referring to 581 d or 581 g here? If it's 581 g, then Gliese 581 g seems to imply the planet doesn't definitely exist, but depends on the eccentricity of d. If it's instead talking about d, then the Possible confirmation section says that it could really exist. -- numbermaniac (talk)

We are referring to Gliese 581 d.MartinZ02 (talk) 02:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

The article seems to pass every criteria. I think we can pass this. -- numbermaniac (talk) 01:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. -- numbermaniac (talk) 01:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]