Talk:Gloster Javelin

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Contradictory statements[edit]

The article body claims the stall warning device was developed for two different reasons, one for deep-stall and the other to avoid spins. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:16, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To enter a spin one must first stall, so the answer is, for both reasons, as in addition to the deep-stall the Javelin had a very flat spin, which was also unrecoverable from. At the time of its service the Javelin was the only RAF aircraft for which stalling and spinning were expressly prohibited, for obvious reasons.

The Javelin is IIRC mentioned in Air Crash Detective by Stephen Barlay, which shows an aerial photo of the crash site of a Javelin that either deep-stalled or flat-spun into the ground. Whilst appearing almost intact from the air, the aircraft is quite flattened.

Opening sentence[edit]

Six adjectives precede the word 'aircraft', with no punctuation - and still does not even mention that we are talking about a jet fighter, such a simple thing. Thank God for the photo and my ability to discern what a jet broadly looks like. This is not well written at all. Needs to be rewritten, so as to be accessible to audiences who are not already familiar with the topic and its terminology. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:78A6:6252:210D:D5F1 (talk) 15:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I have used a 2015 version of the first paragraph that is more standard. You can always improve things yourself. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 16:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]