Talk:Go to the Future

Go to the Future has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 31, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Go to the Future received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Japan: Music Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:04, May 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Music task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by 24.6.151.226 (talk · contribs) on 29 December 2008 with the comment:
Does not appear to meet the criteria for albums. Even the band is of dubious notability, being signed with an unknown label and having no major tours or sales/chart info.
It was contested by Ilion2 (talk · contribs) on 2008-12-29 with the comment:
and albums available on e.g. amazon.com, band profile on allmusic.com

Notability[edit]

Please add some text indicating why this album meets one or more of the following notability requirements:

Wikipedia:Notability - general notability guideline
Wikipedia:Notability (music) - notability guideline for bands, musicians, albums, and songs

A quote from the music notability guideline:

Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article on an artist or band that does not indicate that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7. A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia.

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 22:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Band albums available on amazon.com [1], band profile on allmusic.com [2]. --Ilion2 (talk) 09:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The notability requirements for Wikipedia are higher than this. See Wikipedia:Notability (music). Please improve the article so it is clear that the notability requirements are met, then remove the notability tag I added. If the article is not improved, it will probably wind up at WP:Articles for deletion and it will probably wind up deleted. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Albums.2C_singles_and_songs : "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." That should be enough. The tag was added by User:24.6.151.226. --Ilion2 (talk) 17:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The music group that released this album's notability is in question. Please either beef up Sakanaction so it's notability is no longer in question or add sufficient claims of notability to this article so it can stand alone if Sakanaction is deleted. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 18:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Go to the Future/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 07:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man this review is pending from a long time. Are you going to do it? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Any reason for the two specific citations in the lead? Ordinarily the facts in the lead should be expanded upon in the main body and that's where they can be cited.

Typically with an album or single article I've always put a source after the lead sentence, but I suppose I don't really need to! Done.

"made up of " -> "comprising"

Fixed.

You link techno in the infobox but not in the prose.

Fixed.

"Kusakari was originally in" no need to so quickly repeat her surname.

Replaced with 'she'.

"and "Shiranami Top Water" managed to chart " just "and "Shiranami Top Water" charted " would be tighter.

Done.

Sapporo is linked in the image caption in the section after which it is first mentioned.

Removed, but I thought that image captions generally linked to the subjects they depict as they're not a part of the continuous text flow.

"sound the core of Sakanaction's sound" bit repetitive.

Fixed.

" song "Mikazuki Sunset".[22] "Mikazuki Sunset" was" again, repetitive prose.

Fixed.

"album then" when is "then"? At the moment of the lossless release, shortly afterwards, something else?

Clarified.

" managed to reach number" again, just tighter to say "reached number".

Fixed.

Track lengths don't add up to length. I guess there's filler gaps?

Strange! It's the time listed in the Tower source which is generally based on what the record company says, but the iTunes times add up differently.

Sortable charts table is (a) pointless and (b) doesn't work properly as it moves the second heading!

Fixed.

I'm loathe to see empty cells in tables, so if information is not available, use N/A or {{N/A}} perhaps.

Done, though I don't think I've ever seen an n/a cell in a release history box before.

I'll place on hold, apologies for the delay in the review. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How's the article now? --Prosperosity (talk) 04:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, improved and easily meets the GA criteria, so I'll pass. Good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]