Talk:Godspell (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Christian films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Please, when creating new film articles, see naming conventions: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines. Hoverfish 07:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it God-Spell[edit]

Why not Gospel? 99.184.221.249 (talk) 13:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Giggles[reply]

The word "gospel" derives from the Old English gōdspel, from gōd ‘good’ + spel ‘news, a story’.--Schoolmann (talk) 14:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia[edit]

Some of the parables, such as the Prodigal Son, Lazarus and the rich man, and the Good Samaritan, appear in Luke, not Matthew, but the by-line of the movie says the show is based on the Gospel of Matthew. Nutster 17:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be expanded. The page about the play is okay, but this is too short. Perhaps trivia about the movie could be added.12.216.100.205 22:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Song "We beseech thee" was not included in the movie?[edit]

Quote from the article: "The song Beautiful City was written for and first included in the film, while the songs Learn Your Lessons Well and We Beseech Thee were left out." - Sure about that? At least "We beseech thee" can be found at youtube in a version that clearly has been taken from the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.101.244.117 (talk) 02:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if the YouTube video's description said this when you originally posted this, but now: "Song vid of the Godspell song "We Beseech Thee," which was cut out of the movie. Made with clips of the movie. Sung by Jeff Mylett." It's just clips of the movie with the song added from another source. "We Beseech Thee" is not in the actual movie. Flummery 22:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. now I've seen it. But it is amazing the pictures of the clip match so well the lyrics oft the song. ("Sick...", "Blind...", "Guilty..", etc.) For what reason was the sung cut out of the movie anyway?

According to a Stephen Schwartz fan site: "This song [Beautiful City] was written to replace the song 'We Beseech Thee' as David Greene, the film's director, felt that the latter song was 'too theatrical' to work effectively in the film." [1] Not everyone thinks Greene's decisions were best, though. Gilmer McCormick, who was in the movie, said in a letter to a fan that Greene "didn't know the first thing about American Street Theatre (which is what Godspell was) and just fumbled his way through"! [2] Flummery 20:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Godspellmoviep.jpg[edit]

Image:Godspellmoviep.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Differences from the Musical" section[edit]

The "Differences from the Musical" section is badly ordered and a little confusing. Starts out with a comparison of different actors' interpretations of their musical numbers (surely only applicable to a single production of the play), moves to changes in musical numbers (good), then to Tebelak voicing the Pharisee monster (trivial, and not excluded from a possible play production). Finally, there is the section beginning with the confusing line, "The film is deliberately less staged than the stage version," and moving to the bulleted list of locations.

I'm going to reorder the paragraphs to a more reasonable order of priority, and recast the line introducing the bulleted list. I think the actors' interpretation and Tebelak paragraphs could be dropped completely, but I won't go that far. Schoolmann (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed re. how this section was. It's much improved. I added info about differences in band / "sound". Although I work for drummer Mr. Shutter, I felt that because the differences were important enough to have been included in an allmusic.com review, they were important enough to be reflected here.

Perhaps the Tebelak paragraph can be moved as a note to the section about the Musical Numbers, which shows which character performs them.Kekki1978 (talk) 15:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC) I went ahead and made this change.Kekki1978 (talk) 16:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Godspell (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110822192652/http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/2283/year/1973.html to http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/2283/year/1973.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]