Talk:Goemon's Great Adventure/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Remove refs in lead that are used elsewhere. There is a 1-line quote in audio that should be incoperated with the prose. Finally the article needs some serious copyediting.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Tagged info needing citations.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The gameplay section is far to long and detailed. The character section is also rather long compared to the relatively short plot. The plot lacks any info on an ending. The audio section could be tightened up as well.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The images should be using a template with good explanation why the images are needed as they are all fair-use. In addition the number of images and songs are likely inappropriate for an article of this size.
Cover image has now got a better fair use, but could still do with a reduction in size. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    putting this on hold for a week as nothing seems too difficult to fixJinnai04 November 2009 (UTC)
    Given that only 1 signifigant edit was made in the past week (several other edits were made but reverted to the bot edit after i added {{cn}} templates) i am closing this as a fail. Should someone decide to clean it up soon, it should be able to get back to GA status.Jinnai 22:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]