Talk:Goldberg Variations (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Dance: Ballet

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

This disambiguation page is supported by WikiProject Ballet.

WikiProject Ballet To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See the Image requests page. Articles: Choo Chiat Goh, Vladimir Bourmeister, Columbia City Ballet, Michael Cook (ballet), Peter Schaufuss, Cyril Atanassoff, Post-structuralist ballet
Cleanup : Ballet Fantastique, NYCB/cast lists, re-write the whole Russian ballet article
Copyedit : Rasta Thomas, Ballet (marked as in need of immediate attention)
Disambiguation : Moscow Ballet
Expand : French ballet, Balanchine method, Cecchetti method, Original Ballet Russe, Royal Swedish Ballet, Bloch (dancewear), Turnout (ballet), Opera ballet, English ballet, Italian ballet
NPOV : Capezio
Stubs : Pas de deux, ballet tutu, Nicolai Legat, John Neumeier, Miami City Ballet, more
Unreferenced : Miami City Ballet, Oklahoma City Ballet
Wikify : Moscow Ballet (United States), Oklahoma City Ballet (in need of sections and references)
Other : Review recent changes to ballet articles.

Untitled[edit]

I know that the disambiguation guideline recommend against including more than one link per line on a disambiguation page. I think in this case, however, it is to the benefit of the reader to include an extra link for at least the authors, considering that the links to the works are currently redlinks. This way, the reader can find some information about the author if not the work. --Iamunknown 21:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The guideline is to have one blue link per entry,[1] adding a relevant blue to those entries starting with red links, so your reasoning is well founded. However, if there is no related article for the 2003 book, that entry ought to go. --Private Sweety (talk) 21:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sound good to me :-) --Iamunknown 21:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]