This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Biota of Great Britain and IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandBiota of Great Britain and Ireland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
A fact from Golfballia ambusta appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 August 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 16:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Article is new enough and long enough. Hook is plenty interesting and cited. I see nothing impairing it from going through. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yes; always forget that rule. I've gone ahead and done it for the nominator @Bruxton:. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Krisgabwoosh: Thanks for doing it. I post here because the nomination has been closed. Hope this will not disturb you. ——🦝 The InteraccoonaleWill be the raccoon race (talk・contribs) 16:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]