Talk:Google Developers

Cleanup?

Should this page still be tagged as "in need of cleanup"?

I have done some cleanup and am now removing the tag "in need of cleanup".Shabda 12:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

GWT

Should'nt GWT, and or other projects be on a separate WP page of it's own? Or at least a page about Google Software offerings specifically? Google Code is the landing page for that stuff, but it is also the name of the hosting service, the list of API's, all sorts of things. I see why it was done this way for this article, thats what the page has on it (http://code.google.com/), but should the article be a conglomerate like this, just because the navigation on the web is?

I stongly support this proposal. If nobody has any objection I will move content from here to its own page. Shabda 09:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Since nobody has coments on this, I am going ahead and splitting GWT from here.

Google Web Api

Isn't the soap interface depreciated now?

Kind of. It's unsupported, therefore highly unrecommended. Mambo Jambo 16:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

MPL

I've just read that Google Code announced at OSCON that it has dumped MPL as a permitted license (existing projects are grandfathered in). http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/25/googlecode_bans_mpl/

Anyone able to confirm and update the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.38.160 (talk) 01:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Organization

This article seems very 'thrown together'. A genuine write-up will have to speak in-depth about each section (almost like a code.google.com replication). For instance, there should be a mention of the partnerships Google has with other companies for development tools. Other random thoughts

• A 'History' subsection is in order (e.g., which products graduated from Labs).
• Google Storage needs affirmation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajpaj (talk • contribs) 12:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Languages

I will remove all but English, since its the only available UI language as stated in the FAQ. http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/FAQ Dgutson (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

This page is mostly wrong

A large part of the content is content that has been moved to developer.google.com. I'm thinking a new page should be created with developer in the title or this page should be moved. Is there a standard wiki procedure for splitting a page?   Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Deprecated?

The infobox claims GC is deprecated, which is not something I've heard anywhere else. The justification is a blog post... but as far as I can tell, it refers purely to where the official blog posts will appear, and not be about he actual site itself. --Gwern (contribs) 00:38 5 April 2013 (GMT)

The APIs and developer tools have moved to Google Developers, but the open source project hosting is still at Google Code. Source: http://code.google.com/ Compsciasaur (talk) 06:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps there was a misunderstanding of "we are deprecating downloads ... [at] Google Code" [1]? (That link was mentioned on the Sourceforge blog[2] ). It is still not clear to me exactly what (if anything) is being deprecated. --DavidCary (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Split Google Code and Google Developers

This article to my mind is misleading if you want to inform about, what the google code hosting platform was and why it is discontinued. Like Daniel.Cardenas (talk) stated some years ago it should be split. I stumbled appon this article when I checked the category page of Discontinued_Google_services . Even though a separate article exists, mentioning the closure, it would belong to the category, which means that it needs an own article.--141.76.96.42 (talk) 14:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I also arrived on this page by a redirection from Google code. This redirection should not be there: google code and google developers are clearly two different things (even visible on the code.google.com page)! So if one wants to learn about google code, its starting and ending date, current status and history, a separate google code page is needed. --Jérôme Euzenat 194.199.22.76 (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

New Logo

The infobox features the old Google Developers logo. This is the new one that is featured on the website. (I can't upload it because I don't have a confirmed account.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexismenantaud (talk • contribs) 05:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Google Developers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609043118/http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/google-plugin-eclipse to http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/google-plugin-eclipse

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)