Talk:Gospel of Bartholomew
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
tags![edit]
Too many tags! Content on the tags shouldn't be longer than content of the artcle! --Ephilei 20:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Suggest deletion/redirect[edit]
The essence of this article is that it deals with a possible nothing, that could be just another name of some other ancient apocryph. Norwegian scientific publications in this matter takes it for granted that Gospel of Bartholomew is another name for Questions of Bartholomew, and so does the german article.
Wouldn't it be easier to redirect this to Questions of Bartholomew, straigthen up iw, and just add a line in the articles anbout each of the two candidates
- This text might be the "Gospel of Bartholomew" that Jerome mentioned in the introdution to his commentary on the gospel of Matthew and that is listed in the Decretum Gelasianum as a banned work. Resurrection of Jesus Christ (by Bartholomew) has also been suggested as an alternate candidate for the gospel alias.
Bw Orland (talk) 13:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Removed text[edit]
This also might be related to Bart Simpson, the agless character on the hit television program The Simpsons. Not really encyclopedic, but probably a good-faith first edit. I'll leave a message on the anon's talk page, it's their only contribution to date. Andrewa (talk) 22:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)