Talk:Graham Westley/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
I have a question, with this ---> "The squad failed to gel immediately", there's another one mentioned earlier, what do you mean with "to gel"? In the Return to Stevenage section, this sentence reads odd ---> "...enjoy success in the FA Trophy when his lead his players out at Wembley Stadium". Do you mean ---> "...enjoy success in the FA Trophy when he led his players out at Wembley Stadium"?
Check.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the Return to Stevenage section, please link "Gary Mills" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as a disambiguation. Same section, you have "Gary Mills" and "Mansfield Town" linked twice, you just need it linked once.
Check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
In Reference 11, "Independent.co.uk" ---> "The Independent", better to have it that way. Ref. 67 is missing Publisher info. In Ref. 103, "Press Gazette" needs to be in the "work" format of the source, since it's a magazine.
Check.

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Made all of the necessary changes. Thankfully fixed the horrific "enjoy success in the FA Trophy when his lead his players out at Wembley Stadium" line! Thanks. SBFCEdit (talk) 00:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, you did, and thank you for getting the concerns. Thank you to SBFCEdit for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]