Talk:Grand Lapa Macau

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grand Lapa Macau article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hotels Low‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Macau Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Macau, an attempt to better organize and improve articles related to Macau.MacauWikipedia:WikiProject MacauTemplate:WikiProject MacauMacau articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

mixed information between old and new hotels[edit]

This article currently mixes information between the old (pre-2010) Mandarin Oriental, Macau (which is now the Grand Lapa), and the current hotel at One Central, which opened in 2010. I'd suggest the information relevant to the old building be split out to an article for the Grand Lapa if it's notable enough, and the rest moved to the page Mandarin Oriental, Macau and a redirect placed here. -Sesameball^Talk 14:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did what I could with the split. As I mentioned on the other talk page, I changed the redirect from the old Mandarin Oriental Macau page to point to Mandarin Oriental, Macau as I assume that's what most people typing in the term would be looking for. -Sesameball^Talk 20:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]