Talk:Grant Thornton International

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business: Accounting Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on October 16, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

5th Largest accountancy firm[edit]

Both BDO and Grant Thornton articles state they are the 5th largest accounting firm worldwide. Clearly there is something not quite right. Is there an up-to-date list from a reputable 3rd party to establish the correct position. If not then the claim on both sites should be removed.--GazMan7 (talk) 17:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It largely depends on how you determine rankings - everyone knows the big 4.... but the gap between big 4 and the next firm is fairly vast. I believe BDO claims to be 5th largest based on the number of offices since it includes a number of boutique tax / consultancy firms in its network. Since each country has different rankings for public accounting firms, I would suggest that revenues should be used as a parameter to determine the rankings. DallasJockey

Based on Revenue,McGladrey is the fifth largest firm in the US — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.208.134.75 (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois-based Corporations[edit]

Why does GTI have a template for "Illinois-based Corporations" when GTI is based in London? I'll remove this if agreement. Darkieboy236 (talk) 12:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Written like Advertisement?[edit]

The last sentence in the introduction (second paragraph) sounds like advertising to me - at least it does not comply with my sense of style for encyclopedic writing:

These firms help dynamic organisations unlock their potential for growth by providing meaningful, actionable advice through a broad range of services.

These are quite a few buzz words loved by marketing agencies. And they are not really falsificable or provable: dynamic, unlock their potential, meaningful and actionable advice... This could be the self-description of any consulting firm in the world.

My suggestion: remove the sentence or shorten it to something like "These firms help organisations by providing advice through a broad range of services." --Alpenfreund (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pyramid-ponzi scheme.[edit]

The form that Grant Thornton accountants resolve bankruptcies is by and through also a pyramid-ponzi scheme, where the accountants attempt to resolve the bankruptcy by robbing the clients/victims even further, to pay of debt, including that debt owned to Grant thornton.

To accomplish this, they start charging the clients, account holders with unnecessary, unwanted, and/or none closed, none received services, including credit scamming and promoting legalities from a ' friendly ' / ' bribed ' local court to inhibit payouts to clients.

The stanford international bank fraud is one of those fraud cases where Thornton itself uses ponzi/pyramid schemes to pay off debt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.91.89.206 (talk) 18:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Grant Thornton International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]