Talk:Greaser's Palace

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Westerns: Film Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Film task force.

"Cult film"[edit]

An editor is attempting to remove the description "cult film" from the lede, even after I provided a source (Rolling Stone) for it being considered a cult film. Comments? BMK (talk) 22:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't actually see it listed among the 25 in the 2014 readers' poll at http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/pictures/readers-poll-the-25-best-cult-movies-of-all-time-20140507. Might it have appeared in a previous year's poll? --Tenebrae (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, my mistake, I didn't look and just assumed it would be there when it said it would be there. I'm changing it to another ref. BMK (talk) 22:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, replaced it with 2 cites. The problem is more extensive, though, as the editor removed "cult film" from every article it appeared in. See AN/I. BMK (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was quick! He's blocked already! --Tenebrae (talk) 23:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]