Talk:Green Bay Blizzard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:GreenBayBlizzard.gif[edit]

Image:GreenBayBlizzard.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Page Seems Like A School Report[edit]

It seems to me that whoever created this page based much of the content off of original research. The article does not meet the encyclopedic quality standards that Wikipedia has set; especially with the content headings. I would like to see some work done on this article to make it more of an encyclopedia entry than a school report. Stripey the crab (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you on the History section of this page. The rest of the article is very similar to all of the other teams in the leagues that the Blizzard has been a part of. I wouldn't want to lose information from the History though, if it was to be re-written. Micah008 (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello visitors, I have done substantial clarity revisions to this page, but it is in dire need of news sources that are not dead links. Please contribute if you can! Evanash24 (talk) 02:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Green Bay Blizzard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]