Talk:Greenbelt (Ottawa)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 17 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Saraentwistle.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

I'm curious to see how long the 'development' section I put in lasts.. It is properly referenced, and is based on an official document created by the City of Ottawa. I believe it is relevant regardless of anyone's point of view on the matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.80.198 (talk) 00:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me, although I think Baird's response to the effect of "we're not going to start selling land we expropriated" could be added. -- cmhTC 16:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done (although I couldn't find a source with the actual quote) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.80.198 (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is everything sourced from the NCC's website? As a lifelong inhabitant of Ottawa The NCC and the Greenbelt appear to be nothing more than a Land speculation scheme that benefits developers at the expense of the inhabitants. Bilbous (talk) 06:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Move[edit]

Please be aware that there is a discussion at Talk:Greenbelt (Golden Horseshoe)#Proposed Move to move the article to Ontario Greenbelt. Any input you may have is appreciated. --Natural RX 20:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenbelt (Ottawa). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

peer review[edit]

Off to a great start. The resources used are really reflective of the material. The introduction is straight to the point but a little short, maybe you can add some more information to it. I like how you organized your points, it does not make the article overwhelming with too many subsections. Keep up the great work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeinabFashwal (talkcontribs) 04:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 17 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Saraentwistle (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Naeim9146 (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]