Talk:Greenwich Park

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Bottom‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fan Following[edit]

Would it not be useful to mention the two major fan groups the Park has:

Friends of Greenwich Park - http://www.friendsofgreenwichpark.org.uk/ and Greenwich Park on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/ThePark

The 2nd of which has over 17,000 fans. Seems like to big a number not to mention.

81.147.103.15 (talk) 14:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Photo Gallery[edit]

Is it really necessary to have so many photos of the park?

Specifically, how does an out of focus picture of a suirrel benefit the article?

- arkenstone 00:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but only if they are relevant. Expitheta 15:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The squirrel picture is awesome.

Greenwich park squirrels are lovely! The pic is highly representative of the park, IMO. -sergio

Photo replacement?[edit]

How about it? :)

--Hari 17:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

History and Features sections: What about the Roman remains?[edit]

Are there no sources out there to enable us to add a reference to the Roman remains within the park yet? All I know of it is that 'Time Team' took down the protective railings around the 'pile of bricks' (as passers by described them) so they could do some geophysics and dug a few trenches looking for traces of a Roman road. They reckoned that Watling Street is aligned directly towards the antiquity and actually has to make a turn to point towards the (supposed) position of their river crossing, which is further upstream. They came to the conclusion that there may have been a mansio (temple) there at one time. Although the dig was some years ago (1999, screened in 2000), I guess it takes a few years to filter through peer-review into the archaeological journals and a few years more before any reference books come to mention it?
If that's the case, can anyone tell me whether the Channel 4 Time Team website is rated as a reliable source or not? (Note: in 2003 they came again, looking for Henry VIII's tilt-yard at a site close to the RN College but that's another story). EatYerGreens (talk) 23:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

came here for the same reason. 10 ys later still not mentioned. Here is an official source: www.royalparks.org.uk/parks/greenwich-park/things-to-see-and-do/ancient-greenwich/roman-remains 47.71.2.160 (talk) 10:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marathon[edit]

Surely there should be something about the London marathon starting here? --The penfool 18:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by The penfool (talk • contribs)

Added mention of Marathon 'red start' Paul W (talk) 11:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greenwich Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]