Talk:Grey Literature Network Service

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Untitled[edit]

Amsterdam, 16 September 2009 Wikipedia Copyright Permission I, Dominic Farace, hereby affirm that I am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of www.greynet.org. I agree to publish in part or whole above work under the free license Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Dr. Dominic Farace, Director and Owner TextRelease GreyNet, Grey Literature Network Service

(Chicon59 (talk) 22:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Please undo the deletion tag. (Chicon59 (talk) 22:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

It is convenient to link the Grey Literature International Steering Commitee (GLISC) with Grey Literature Network Service, but it is not advisable to merge the two terms. The GLISC in fact is mainly an institutional association and not a private Network belonging to one person only. Picchietto (talk) 18:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is necessary to merge, the best for the "Grey Literature International Steering Committee" should be to be merged with "Grey Literature"

For the same reason, it is convenient to link the "Grey Literature Network Service" with SIGLE, but it is not advisable to merge the two terms. The SIGLE in fact is mainly an institutional association and not a private Network belonging to one person only. SIGLE may be well merged with European Association for Grey Literature Exploitation (EAGLE) which is its natural development in time

I agree with the previous comment.(sandra67)

GLISC should stand alone, as an international, independent committee. If necessary, EAGLE could be merged with SIGLE, as its former producing network, so that EAGLE may become a chapter of the SIGLE article (Chicon59 (talk) 12:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Merge OpenSIGLE with Grey Literature Network Service (GreyNet) is not a good idea because OpenSIGLE is an international project, hosted by a French public information centre. While OpenSIGLE is co-managed by GreyNet, it is definitively NOT a product of the GreyNet network. (Chicon59 (talk) 12:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

The authors of the Wikipedia article are the right owners of the original text. We will add a formal permission. Please stop the speedy deletion process. (Chicon59 (talk) 11:58, 14 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Just want to remind everyone that though the authors of material here do own the material, by contributing it here in terms of our license, they have given everyone in the world, including other Wikipedia editors, the right to edit it, reuse it , and distribute it, in any fashion whatsoever, and their permission is not needed or even relevant. In fact, we very strongly discourage any attempt of anyone to show WP:OWNership over the content of an article. If material is merged, it will be according to consensus, not their preference. I also call attention to WP:COI. DGG ( talk ) 16:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]