Talk:Grey reef shark/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This is a wonderfully interesting article. I have no suggestions for improvement to offer. It is excellent. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Very well written; interesting and clearly presented
b (MoS): Follows MoS
- a (prose): Very well written; interesting and clearly presented
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Excellently referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are to reliable sources c (OR): No OR apparent
- a (references): Excellently referenced
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers all major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
- a (major aspects): Covers all major aspects
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Congratuations! Another great article.