Talk:Grimlock (Dungeons & Dragons)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1st appearance?[edit]

I'd love to see a first appearance, along with a publishing history. Are they 1st edition, 2nd, or 3rd? What adventures do they feature in?

Grimlocks originated in 1E, Fiend Folio, IIRC. Robbstrd 17:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete references[edit]

Place all incomplete references here.--Robbstrd 01:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Light sensitivity[edit]

I do not see any references about whether or not grimlocks are sensitive to light at http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/grimlock.htm. It is safe to assume that this characteristic has carried over from the second edition to the third one. ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 03:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it carried over, such a sensitivity would have been mentioned. It is not mentioned in the SRD nor in the Monster Manual, therefore it did not carry over. Wikipedia editors rely on their sources, not assumptions.--Robbstrd 21:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe someone should check to see if there is any errata?


their blind and have no eyes why would they have any visusal sensativity -...

Sunburn? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.190.30 (talk) 04:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: speedy close. 75.142.152.104 (talk) 03:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grimlock (Dungeons & Dragons) → Grimlock — Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimlock, there seemed to be consensus for a merge over deletion. So I've merged the content of Grimlock into the List of Autobots article. We should now move this page to the base title, as suggested in the AfD. That will necessitate a move of the current Grimlock article to a new title, of course, in order to preserve the attribution history. 75.142.152.104 T 01:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose, at least for now. That AfD discussion has not yet been concluded, so a merge was premature as is this nomination. In fact it's very likely that the AfD will end with a concensus to keep. PC78 (talk) 03:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - even if the Transformers article is redirected or deleted, then Grimlock would be better served as a disambiguation page rather than moving this page there. BOZ (talk) 11:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The Transformer is the primary topic. And this is coming from a gamer! Powers T 19:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: this discussion has been rendered irrelevant, as Grimlock was a clear keep at AFD. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grimlock (Dungeons & Dragons). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grimlock_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)&oldid=1202468043"