Talk:Grumpy Old Bookman

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Oh dear, I don't seem to be doing so well, alas. It was not meant to be an ad at all! The Grumpy Old Bookman's litblog is well-known in the writing world and all I was trying to do was create a new article on WIKI. I have NO affiliation with GOB, or Michael Allen at all. GOB is mentioned quite a few times on the WIKI (lit) pages but there was no article, so I thought I'd make a page.

Please tell me how I can improve the article and I will be more than happy to do so.

Sorry, I forgot to sign yesterday...

AndreaUKA 09:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten the short article according to "Wikipedia standards" without having had a look at the blog myself. I hope it's okay now. The only thing that remains to be done is to disambiguate Michael Allen, as that link only points to a disambiguation page. <K F> 10:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All I'll say is that I think it would be a great shame to remove this article. Recognised by The Guardian as one of the finest literary blogs ever, GOB is crammed full of extremely useful info and articles of great use to the writer and publisher, especially the small indie's who, believe me, can do with all the help they can get.

Up to you, but I don't see the necessity, or use, of removing, myself. AndreaUKA (talk) 11:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

title was wrong[edit]

I moved the article from the original (incorrect) title The Grumpy Old Bookman since there's no "the" in the title. Aristophanes68 (talk) 00:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]