Talk:Guidon (United States)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Platoon Guidons?[edit]

So, the intro paragraph mentions platoons as having guidons, but then the entire article only deals with company level or higher guidons. I can't find any resource that depicts or describes a single platoon guidon. Can platoons actually have their own guidon? How are they marked? Or is the lead inaccurate and does the reference to platoons need to be removed? --68.255.107.49 (talk) 04:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Platoon Guidons unlikely[edit]

I know from personal experience that the USAF does not have guidons below the squadron-level (a unit of approximately 100). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.127.138.79 (talk) 14:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Not moved. Vegaswikian 20:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guidon (U.S. Army) → Guidon — no need to disambig —Pmsyyz 01:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC) -discussion section created by SigPig |SEND - OVER 12:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Survey[edit]

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move[edit]

  1. Support: If there hasn't been another Guidon page until now, there's no point in waiting further. Once someone gets the ambition to create another Guidon page, this can be moved back to the disambiguated title. Until then, it's pointless to have an "X" redirecting to an "X (whatever)". —Wknight94 (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Guidon should be redirecting to Colours, standards and guidons, as generic terms. Again, Guidon (U.S. Army) refers to a specific American interpretation of a broader topic; it does not automatically inherit the disambiguated use, since the term guidon is indeed ambiguous. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 21:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - in opposition to the move[edit]

  1. Strong oppose. This article deals with U.S. Army guidons in particular, which are a very different animal from guidons used in (e.g.) Commonwealth armies. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 12:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per SigPig. Disambiguation is often necessary for common terms even if they don't have their own article (being more dictionary definitions best left to Wikipedia) or which are best redirected to a less ambiguous, existing Wikipedia article as in this case. Gene Nygaard 19:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guidon (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guidon (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Guidon_(United_States)&oldid=1213999722"