Talk:Guinness share-trading fraud

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Private Equity

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity Task Force, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This task force seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:

Private EquityWikipedia:WikiProject Private EquityTemplate:WikiProject Private EquityPrivate Equity articles

Just read through this article on a link-clicking binge, and couldn't help but notice an an apparently irrelevant line about the defendants being Jewish, from which no conclusions were drawn - it seems the reader is left to fill in the blanks that it was an evil money-grabbing Jewish conspiracy. Can someone fill in the significance of this observation, or otherwise remove it? Was the intention to re-enforce anti-semitic stereotypes, or to point out that racists seized on this event to propagate their hatred, or what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:5C1E:300:DCE3:8B64:E7DC:818A (talk) 20:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

is this a reptbl ref 4 p. worsthorne's comments? Jamaissur

From a speech given by David Irving:

Peregrine Worsthorne, that great editor of the Sunday Telegraph, made so bold, a year or two ago now, as to draw attention to the fact that every single defendant in the Guinness Shares Scandal was of a certain, uh, type. (Laughter) I am not going to go into more detail than that. He mentioned in an editorial in the Sunday Telegraph that every single defendant was of a particular religion. This of course is entirely immaterial to us. We don't mind what religion people are. It makes no difference if Gerald Ronson and Ernest Saunders and the rest of them are not really called that at all; that "Tiny" Rowland's real name is something completely different is a matter of complete indifference to me. But what does worry me is that apart from the Sunday Telegraph the English press for some reason found it necessary not to mention this — that this was an obvious unifying factor which for some reason or other had not to be mentioned.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/speeches/DestinySpeech1990.html

Can we have the Telegraph ref? Sorry but I don't consider Irving to be a non-POV source. Tho' the decision not to prosecute the Rothschilds suggests that the anti-semitic aspect was a bit of a red herring from the start.86.42.193.51 01:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second case[edit]

The "second case" seems to be the "Secondary trial", mentioned later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenmamba123123 (talk • contribs) 12:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guinness one?[edit]

Text mention "Guinness One" occasionally without an explanation. A typo? Викидим (talk) 03:14, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]