Talk:Gulfstream III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old infobox[edit]

This article was tagged by WikiProject Aircraft as needing to be brought up to snuff. If the old spec sheet should need to be replaced, it is below. thadius856talk 05:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC) I am commenting it out to save screen real estate. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move[edit]

C-20 GulfstreamGulfstream III — use as basis for article covering all variants, similar to the work done on North American SabrelinerJoseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was that the page was moved as per request

Survey[edit]

Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move[edit]

  1. Support as nom. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support As nominated. - BillCJ 20:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - in opposition to the move[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I hate to get political here, but which version of the C-20 is it that the Democrats (Pelosi) claim has a range of 2,000 miles? Every version I see has a range of well over 4,000 miles.

C-20C Variant?[edit]

This article lists the C-20C as a "C-20B with upgraded and "hardened" secure communications, often utilized as backup aircraft accompanying the VC-25A aircraft when it is operating as Air Force One." The 89th Airlift Wing lists only C-20Bs in it's inventory, and if anyone were to have a backup aircraft accompanying Air Force One, it would be them, wouldn't it? How good is the info on the C-20C? TCav (talk) 01:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gulfstream III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gulfstream III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]