Talk:Guru Har Krishan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Not quite sure if the transliteration in Devanagari is correct (actually I'm pretty certain it's wrong). Please can someone double check it for me. Sukh 13:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Neutrality[edit]

Made changes to remove the use of "Ji" which is not really proper for an encyclopedia. The use of the term indicates a degree of respect or affection which is not appropriate for a neutral source of information. All other articles in this group need this edit as well. Also thousands of people being cured by a blessing is not simply a statement of fact but is part of Sikh history and legend. Verifying this outside of that context is not possible and so should not be presented as simple historical fact.

Actually I disagree. Please sign your comments so I know who I'm talking to. "Sri Guru Har Krishan Ji" can be considered the full title of the Guru so this should be stated to begin with and then the guru should be referred to as Guru Har Krishan, or Har Krishan thereafter. It's on the same line as Pope_Benedict_XVI being called His Holiness. "Sri Guru Har Krishan Ji" is what Sikhs call him "officially".
However, I agree that the rest of the article needs the formalities removed. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 7 July 2005 09:51 (UTC)

Redirect[edit]

I think "Har Krishan" should redirect to this article... currently there isn't an article of that name, so does anyone want to make one, or shall I do it?--J.a.f.a.c. 04:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 12:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


A Picture is worth Quite a few words[edit]

I see that the other Gurus have some pictures on them - why not this one? Just a thought :

MrASingh 21:22, 05 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why All the Confusion?[edit]

What is the absolute confusion of Sikhism? Is that the basis of the religion - the confusion that all of the writers about the religion seem to share? Aside from the chaos of the articles on Wikipedia, even the articles over the internet are all premised on confused explanations of the Sikh history. Why is this? Stevenmitchell (talk) 12:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Age of death[edit]

He died 7 or 8 years old? Both are mentioned in article. --87.93.55.23 (talk) 11:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some correction[edit]

Must use word "ji" after the name of Gurus 2409:4055:19A:6161:3112:7079:9190:9D8 (talk) 07:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is under no such requirement. —C.Fred (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]