Talk:HD 219134 b

Surface characteristics?[edit]

Any indication of calculated surface temperature? At that distance it must be around 1,000K! Is it a Lava planet? Fig (talk) 10:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This link [1] quote 700K as the surfce temperature, which is only the same as Mercury and seems suspiciously low to me. I did a back of envelope calculation and got ~1,500K in that scenario! Fig (talk) 11:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Super-Earth, Near-Earth sized, both?[edit]

PHL's definition of a Super-Earth is an exoplanet that has a mass greater than 5M⊕ and/or a radius of 1.5⊕ or grater (Near-Earth size is smaller than those values). Initially when I looked at the mass I saw it was 4M⊕ so I put it under the near Earth sized category. Later I looked at the radius and it was over 1.6! So now what do I classify this as? Both? PHL states it needs to meet only 1 characteristic and this planets properties meet both that of a Near-Earth sized exoplanet and one of a super-Earth. Davidbuddy9 (talk) 03:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Planetbox usage[edit]

The image in the infobox should not be used as it does not follow the usage guide for the template:

This template is part of a group of templates that are used to display information about a specific extrasolar planet.
Images of published planetary properties are preferred where available, especially when they are available from cited publications.
Artist's conception, regardless of the source, should be avoided.
Examples of acceptable images include
* direct images, such as one used for GJ 758 b, in the rare cases where these are available;
* output of a model that is integral to a cited paper, such as the image used in HD 80606 b;
* user-generated images that clearly illustrate published properties, such as the size comparisons currently used in GJ 1214 b or Gliese 436 b.

My edits followed these guidelines but were revered by User:MarioProtIV.

A useful radius comparison to Earh in the relevant section of the article was also removed.

I'm opening discussion as to why ...

--EvenGreenerFish (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like if the discussion was held here, rather then on all of the other pages. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 11:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]