Talk:HEC-RAS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Rivercad xp.jpg[edit]

Image:Rivercad xp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operating Systems?[edit]

What Operating Systems will this software run under, i.e. WinXP, Vista, Win7, Win8, etc... 32-bit, 64-bit, etc.... Jonny Quick (talk) 01:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added now for current version 5.0.7 (per docu in official download section). GermanJoe (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive vendor spam and promotional editing[edit]

The mention of noteworthy vendors or licensees needs independent reliable sources with some non-promotional coverage for verification. Wikipedia is no product catalog or free PR platform. I have removed most of the blatant advertising by editors with a probable conflict of interest, although some of the article's content still reads like a product leaflet and needs more work (and independent sources). GermanJoe (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]