Talk:HESA Shahed 278

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Article name and other changes[edit]

For the second time, I have moved the article to the corrct full title per the WP:AIR/PC naming conventions for aircrafts, which is "COmapny, designation/name", according to the information provided in the sources. I have also rewritten the Lead sentence in accordance with these guidelins, and removed the non-English script from the Infobox title field. Please refrain from undoing these changes again, and instead discuss why you believe the guidelines should not apply in this case. Thanks for your hard wark in preparing this article, but please realize that you do not OWN the page, and that there are guidelines for a standardized format for aircraft airticles that needs to be followed in most cases, including those from Iran. Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. - BillCJ (talk) 17:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Number built 3"?[edit]

So what about these: http://www.defence.pk/forums/iranian-defence/170689-shahed-278-helicopter.html and especially these: http://www.palba.cz/forumfoto/albums/userpics/13199/IRN_Shahed278_01.jpg Gatrika (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

from the photos you provided and an article I added I can count at least 7-8 different copies (the 6 in one photo, one is hidden, the rotor can be seen), the OH model and a light blue one in another. At the time being I updated the number to 6 and referenced the 2 photos in mehrnews article. I guess we can assume mass-production and with for further official announcements. Sarmadys (talk) 15:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HESA Shahed 278. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130102111007/http://www.mehrnews.com/en/newsdetail.aspx?NewsID=1777965 to http://www.mehrnews.com/en/newsdetail.aspx?NewsID=1777965

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]