Talk:HMAS Australia (1911)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

Having had an initial quick couple of read throughs, this looks to be at or about GA-level. I will now start a more detailed review. Pyrotec (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

There's a lot of information in it.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   There does not appear to be any edit wars; however the article appears to have undergone two moves and a major merge operation about three hours before it was submitted to WP:GAN, but a diff of the versions before and after show no change !!!!!

   That would be your fault for reviewing it so fast. ;) No, I histmerged in the version Sturm and Saberwyn had been working on in Saber's sandbox. It will be stable now. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 19:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding the article GA-status. It appears to have potential at WP:FAC. Pyrotec (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)