Talk:HMCS Kootenay (DDE 258)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scuttled off Mexico[edit]

Sources on the internet state that Kootenay was scuttled off Mexico in 2001 (or possibly 2001). An unregistered user 66.119.179.93 made an edit changing "She was sunk off Mexico as an artificial reef in 2001." to "She was thought to have been sunk off Mexico as an artificial reef in 2001. There are no reports after 2001 to indicate she was sunk." There seems to be no shortage of online sources stating that she was scuttled off Mexico in 2001 (or 2000). I have not found any sources saying that this did not happen. If somebody has some sources for a claim that this did not happen, then please quote them to justify casting doubt on the the statement that she was scuttled off Mexico in 2001.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide cites for the assertion that it did. All I've seen is a blog entry, not a WP:RS.--User:LeadSongDog (talk) 03:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HMCS Kootenay (DDE 258). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMCS Kootenay (DDE 258). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism and sourcing concerns[edit]

The narrative recently added by 2607:FEA8:C3E0:4130:5454:4B79:827:642B needs to be rewritten to meet Wikipedia standards for encyclopedic tone per MOS:WE. That said, the first person narrative style and the lack of a citation per WP:CITE suggests that this narrative was copied from an unknown source with minor or no edits, and plagiarism is a serious violation of Wikipedia policies. Alternately, it may the editor's own story, which would violate the central Wikipedia tenet of no original research. This story needs a citation meeting WP:RS or I will remove it. Carguychris (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted the addition, it is uncited, unencyclopedic and reeks of having been ripped from a blog. Had I noticed it earlier I would have reverted it on the spot. Llammakey (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to give the editor 24 hours but that's fine! Let's keep an eye on this article; this sort of thing has a habit of resurfacing. Carguychris (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]