Talk:HMS Cygnet (H83)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 01:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Why is the decommissioning bit repeated down after the convoy list? If it's there for a reason (other than leftover from the merge) it needs a citation.
Relic, deleted.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Per the comment I made on your talk page, it would also be worthwhile to check the navigation templates for the articles you merged and see where they're still pointing to redirects (as here). Parsecboy (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the redirect on the disambig page. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]