Talk:HM Treasury

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:HM Treasury/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Where in the Wiki-universe can one consult articles about the treasury model ? (It is almost as though it were a state secret that) for decades now there's been a major department dedicated to projections based on econometric assumptions by which every major decision can be tried out for possible outcomes. It is time that some of these assumptions to be subjected to a fitness for purpose test themselves0poponax (talk) 09:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 09:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Here comes a grammar nazi![edit]

Hi - sorry, but "her" ( or "his") in Her/His Majesty's is not a pronoun here, it's a (possessive) adjective (if it were a pronoun, it would be "Him Majesty's" when there's a king on the throne). Have done the change. Maelli (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updates requires[edit]

I think some of the ministers on this are no longer in the Treasury such as Felicity Buchan. RyanPLB (talk) 16:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

addition of unreferenced material[edit]

An anonymous editor recently added a substantial amount of prose and a large table to this article. Unfortunately, this material is almost completely unreferenced. The prose looks like original research and includes rhetorical questions. The table looks useful, but the reference used repeatedly throughout it (60 times!) is undefined so the material isn't particularly verifiable. How should these problems be addressed? -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]