Talk:HSC T&T Spirit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HSC T&T Spirit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestion[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Propose merging USAV Spearhead (TSV-X1) into this article along the lines of HSC Manannan which has both a civilian and military history. Both are about the same vessel with a fair amount of content forking. The individual service histories aren't long and complicated enough to require separate articles. Gymeinx (talk) 05:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - per the very reasons cited by the opposer. This vessel has both a military history and a civilian history, there is no need to conflate the two. Take for example the similar article, such as the MV Dublin Swift [aka Westpac Express (HSV-4676)] page, where documenting two different histories in a single article can lead to confusion. Even though the two pages in this proposal currently have limited content, we can see from the examples of similar vessels such as HSV-2 Swift and HSC Manannan that these articles can grow. Wikipedia is not made of paper, so we don't need to save room by needlessly condensing articles. There are other ships that have multiple articles documenting multiple histories, for example;

These are a few examples where merging was neither wanted or needed. Merging is not needed for no these pages as well. - wolf 06:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: It's long-standing practice to merge the same ship with different careers into one page. The claim that this is rare doesn't stand up to scrutiny (having a quick search through the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships archive). This article was discussed with a series of others at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships/Archive 58#IMO number conflicts where such merges are usually done uncontroversially. In this case, the only reason this wasn't recommended for a merge was Thewolfchild's objection. My view is that the material already overlaps, and there so little of it that it is best discussed in one place, with separate sections for the different careers. Klbrain (talk) 08:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.