Talk:Hadong Ambush

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hadong Ambush article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hadong Ambush has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 1, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
October 20, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

Military history: Asian / Korean / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Korea GA‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles

GA

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War GA‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
GA	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hadong Ambush/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A very good article that is close to passing GA once the minor problems identified below are sorted out. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"a successful ambush of North Korean forces." - US forces surely?
The article suffers a bit from repetitions - e.g. "battalion" in the third paragraph of the lead, "committed" in the first paragraph of Outbreak, stream in withdrawal
"Having fallen out of favor with the North Korean command" - South surely?
- I have completed all of these fixes. Thank you for your review. —Ed!^(talk) 19:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great work, article is ready for GA.--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]