Talk:Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Major edit 23 Aug 2006 - correcting misinformation introduced 5 Jan 2006[edit]

Edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hague_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Cultural_Property_in_the_Event_of_Armed_Conflict&diff=71370560&oldid=57034353

I basically reverted the change of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hague_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Cultural_Property_in_the_Event_of_Armed_Conflict&diff=33963454&oldid=26868138

The burden of the 5 January 2006 edit is a misconception - art theft in war is of course an important legal issue but not one that is the focus of the convention that this article is about.

Source: see text of convention, linked in article.

Tschild 13:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional project[edit]

I have added the article to the International relations project. PKKloeppel (talk) 15:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USA and Chile did not sign[edit]

In some articles is stated, that the USA did not signed this treaty (eg Pax Cultura or Protective sign). Should this not be mentioned here? Sebastian scha. (talk) 22:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?[edit]

I just marked a whole section for copyvio, as it appeared to be copied wholesale from the website. Upon further investigation, it seems the first of the marked paragraphs is merely an uncited quotation from the treaty itself, rather than an outright violation. The rest appears to be commentary, and a cursory glance did not reveal such in the treaty or other PD documents, though a deeper search may be warranted. Morgan Riley (talk) 03:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.uscbs.org/about_us.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The same has happened again with this edit... Reverting... L.tak (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes in Section:World War II and Degenerate Art[edit]

There are various quotation marks used throughout the section, but no citations. Here is an example:

The Nazi party through the “Third Reich confiscated close to 20% of all Western European art during the war. “Countless objects including some of Europe’s most prized treasures and artworks went missing. Some objects were destroyed outright for not being Germanic enough”. “At the end of the Second World War, the Nazi party looted at least one-third of all private art in France”.


Not sure what happened. Perhaps those are passages from a particular source.

Could be from the book mentioned at the end of the section:

"According to Lynn H. Nicholas in The Rape of Europa: The Fate of Europe's Treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War, the displacement of art was unprecedented because never before have objects been moved about on such a large scale”.

2606:A000:BFC0:37:8C29:756:156D:9047 (talk) 08:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Is there any reason not to delete International Council on Monuments and Sites from the list of references? The full text of the treaty appears to be included in Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict - 1954. Mcljlm (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

States Parties section[edit]

There is a hatnote asking for more information here, but what additional information might be needed in this section? - BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hague_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Cultural_Property_in_the_Event_of_Armed_Conflict&oldid=1202540104"