Talk:Hall XPTBH/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Will review this soon. Reviewer: WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 19:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Comments
- I believe the aircraft had a bomb bay, correct? If so, clarify in the article.
- Huh, I can't believe I left that out. It did - it was the whole reason it had a twin-float arrangement as opposed to the single-float+outriggers the Navy tended to prefer.
Done. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Neither can I. I thought it was so because of the large size of the plane.
- Huh, I can't believe I left that out. It did - it was the whole reason it had a twin-float arrangement as opposed to the single-float+outriggers the Navy tended to prefer.
- What type of X-duties were the aircraft preforming at Newport? WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 19:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- The references actually don't go into any detail, just that it was on "testing duty". WP:COMMONSENSE says that it was aerial torpedo testing (since it was, in fact, the Naval Torpedo Station...) so I've added a few words to that effect.
- Thanks! - The Bushranger One ping only 20:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Expansion would be nice, although isn't a requirement. Passed. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 22:37, 12 February 2011 (UTC)