Talk:Hank Williams First Nation

This page was proposed for deletion by CorbieVreccan (talk · contribs) on 29 May 2023.
It was contested by Mushy Yank (talk · contribs) on 2023-05-29 with the comment:
The tags were there for long but they had become not really appropriate.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Film: Canadian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Nalh66 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (See also: Deleted Contribs)

Empty citations being re-added[edit]

@Mushy Yank: What's with your re-adding the empty cite, AFI Fest? The only content at that page is "No movie found.." Obviously, you can't use something like that to cite content. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 17:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, As I said in reply to your template and message on my TP, no it didn't work and no I did not re-add it, I simply added it. But they are not empty citations, they're useful, reliable and were sourcing the material you removed. Here are the urlS:

https://www.afi.com/news/native-american-heritage-month-viewing-guide/ to source the plot (which I had done despite guidelines indicating it is not necessary)
https://fest.afi.com/2004/international-feature-competition-2004/hank-williams-first-nation/ to prove filming location

Feel free to try and insert them with the Citeweb template and see for yourself the result, if you have time. If you don't have time or interest, I might do it myself someday. Best, — MY, OH, MY! (mushy yank) — 19:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: In removing multiple citations that didn't source the content, I thought I had removed all cites to the empty AFI page and you were putting them back; I had actually left one in the infobox, but flagged it as not citing the content it was used for.[1] You didn't actually "re" add the citation, but you removed the "content not in source / failed verification" flag, and then used the failed citation twice in the article.[2] The links you just posted above are not what you used in the article. As to my tone, you came and removed the call for citations but have done some odd edits that didn't really meet the sourcing criteria. So if I sound terse, that's why. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 20:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done — MY, OH, MY! (mushy yank) — 20:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]