Talk:Hannelore Kohl

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 April 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

,

Untitled[edit]

Hannelore Kohl was not Catholic, she was member of the Evangelical Church in Germany (like most peope born in Berlin and the former eastern germany in that time). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.191.71.89 (talk • contribs)

category deletions[edit]

According to the article she was from Berlin, was a chef and a writer (of a cookbook), and did commit suicide. There's no point in removing the categories if the text is not changed, and no sourced were cited for either action. --Fang Aili ^talk 20:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical Depression!?![edit]

There is absolutely no basis in the reference to her having clinical depression. The text of the reference reads:

The charge against Mr Kohl is not that he was nasty to his wife. Many men are nasty to their wives, and cannot cope with their depression.

This is hardly a diagnosis (or anything for that matter).

Michael David 00:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hannelore Kohl.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Hannelore Kohl.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Red Army =/= Russians[edit]

Not everyone in the Soviet Red Army was a Russian.105.0.4.230 (talk) 10:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. The "Russian" reference is sourced, as far as I can see, only from the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror. These are English tabloid newspapers which many wikipedia contributors think should be avoided as sources, on grounds of dubious honesty, except in exceptional circumstances. I'm not sure I necessarily go that far, but in this case, given that there's already another English language reference that is, in its way, just as shocking, but manages to convey the information without libelling (if you think it a libel) Russian soldiers, I removed the bit which I think you must have in mind. Feel free to improve it further as appropriate, though! Regaerds Charles01 (talk) 10:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]