Talk:Haplogroup L-M20

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History articles

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Haplogroup H (mtDNA)#H2|H2a1]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

Has anyone noticed the eerie phonetic similarity between the names Baluchistan, Balochistan, etc. and the ancient Mesopotamian references to a place in the east called "Meluhha" and the Aryan references to barbarian "Mlecchas" and their ilk? Not to mention the modern ethnonym of the people who speak the Brahui language. Ebizur 21:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link to www.familytreedna.com[edit]

I noticed that the link to www.familytreedna.com was broken, but wasn't sure exactly where it originally pointed to. Familytreedna does have a project page on haplogroup L, but I'm not sure anything there supports the statements in the paragraph that are attributed to the link. I redirected the link to the Familytreedna haplogroup L project page, but there are probably better web pages out there to support the contention that European members of haplogroup L likely belong to subclade L2. And actually, my personal experience is that European members are just as likely to belong to no subclade that has yet to be identified as to subclade L2. (These would be designated as L*.)

Eljefe3126 (talk) 18:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Asia section[edit]

The West Asia and the Central Asia section could probably be represented better in a table. nihar (talk) 11:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have put a table for West Asia, when I find time I will put one for Central Asia too. Meanwhile if somebody finds time, please go ahead. I will join you. nihar (talk) 05:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Y-DNA haplogroups by ethnic groups[edit]

The above article has been listed for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y-DNA haplogroups by ethnic groups. Wapondaponda (talk) 04:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What???!!! Are they nuts??? СЛУЖБА (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Yunusbayev and from what areas his Avars?[edit]

There are different opinions of different scientists, and you have only one B.Yunusayev. But he isn't Caucasian, and the ethnic turk from turkic Bashkortostan (Ural-region) and came it to Dagestan for the purpose of creation some the Pan-Turkist propaganda myths. In its work isn't present what words for example Avars he investigated, from what villages and areas they were. Other scienist K.Bulayeva instead of Avars investigated Akhvakhs. from the village of Novomekhelta. As far as I know B.Yunusbayev has data from non-avarian inhabitants from Ashilta. It not Avars in general. There are no data of Avars. It everything forgery. Let he will specify from what villages, from what areas are his so called Avars? Instead of Avars these geneticists for some reason use anny the anti-Avarian separatists.I insist on that opinions of other scientists were used. Moreover, in these works it has to be surely specified from what villages, from what areas materials, differently it not science undertook, and charlatanism is simple.37.139.52.40 (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indus Valley Civilisation[edit]

There is an obvious, yet unsourced, link with the Indus Valley Civilisation. Does anybody care to find sources for this link? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani origins?[edit]

@RedPlanet321: Interesting comment on Sepgupta et al. (2006):

"the article isolates three subgroups of haplogroup L. They are characterized as follows: L1 M76, L2 M317, L3 M357 (as explained, the names are now different in ISOGG.). The latter two are novel markers. Interestingly, the Indian sample is predominantly L1, while the Pakistani L's are more or less half L1 and half L3 (plus a couple L2 among the Makrani), which suggest that the haplogroup may have originated in the NW/Pakistan area rather than in Southern India. Unlike some previous papers, the group seems overall more frequent, and more dispersed, in Pakistan than in India."

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No link to info that 5.9% russians of Arkhangelsk oblast are L-m357(L3, L1c)[edit]

Its said that Hongyan Xu in 2014 found that data, but he is not responding to my emails, and facebook messages. Can anyone tell me where to find more info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.153.129.236 (talk) 04:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Haplogroup L-M20. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu kingdoms in Syria[edit]

@Kautilya3: this one's rich, even for this kind of edits. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unclear sentence[edit]

"The International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG) also provides an amateur tree." This is an unclear sentence regarding the meaning of the "also". Please note correctly what you mena!!! 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:6D92:387A:377:A801 (talk) 13:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The para "Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex" obviously has been added completely neglecting any context. This is a bad sign for the author.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:6D92:387A:377:A801 (talk) 13:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ybp?[edit]

"ybp" is noscientific date. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:6D92:387A:377:A801 (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

L-M20[edit]

1 person in the United States, Moses, has this Haplogroup, he is part of A00, specifically A-PR291, his current Haplogroup is Q-M242. I'm guessing because of his connection to A-PR291 he has a lot of groups in him. 184.100.50.165 (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]