Harris Park Transport is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
The table and of routes post Harris Park Transport's demise is not required. It is already covered in the prose.
The article should be about events during HPT's tenure and the immediate transition period thereafter, not unrelated events years later. The history of routes is fancruft. If it needs to be covered, should be done on the Bus routes in Sydney article. Mo7838 (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think the table of routes is required since 1. They were not mentioned in any Wikipedia article. 2. They also provide information about the current status of the route. 3. They summarise the prose in table form.Marcnut1996 (talk) 01:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
1) Just because it isn't mentioned doesn't mean it is required. It is fancruft. If they need to be mentioned, and it is debatable if within the scope of Wikipedia, then the Bus routes in Sydney article would be a more appropriate place.
2) The article is about HPT and should solely be about events from 1931 until its cessation in December 2004 and the immediate handover period that followed, not what happened to its former products in 2007, 2010 etc.
3) The routes are already listed, the table is just duplicating the same info in a padded out format. Mo7838 (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have to conclude that the table is irrelevant to this article, Out of scope. I see that all the bus routes of the company itself have been already mentioned quite clearly and some in point form--I don't think a table is required when it's already explained in prose/lists (WP:WHENTABLE). This table consists of the same routes, only showing the new operators and other information; this looks like it's more relevant to Bus routes in Sydney, if notable enough. Whether it's mentioned or not anywhere else or provides up-to-date information, it still needs to be added to a article where it's WP:RELEVANT. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
Response to third opinion request: