Talk:Harry in Your Pocket
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Harry in your pocket.jpg[edit]
Image:Harry in your pocket.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Plot and Jargon Section[edit]
I recently saw this movie and it's one of my favorites. I took it on myself to tighten up the plot description and I think I did a pretty good job on that.
I also made a section about the lifestyle of the wire mob. The detailed view of the operations of the criminals is one of the most oddly-charming aspects of the film I felt it deserved a spotlight of its own.
The trouble with writing about a movie about pickpockets is if you aren't in crime yourself its very hard to find references about it. The bit about the two Seattle cannon-squad detectives being tech advisers to the film was cribbed from the previous version of this; I have no references as to how they knew that but I think it would cool to put that stuff in. If someone could provide a pointer … —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZehnKatzen (talk • contribs) 21:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)