Talk:Harvard morgue case

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

On 27 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cedric Lodge to Harvard morgue scandal. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 27 February 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. To alternate suggested title Harvard morgue case. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 16:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cedric Lodge → Harvard morgue scandal – Per WP:SINGLEEVENT. He is "famous" but not notable, and virtually all coverage of him is about this case. Even the article is about the case, not him. If you search his name, just as many articles come up about his wife and co-defendants as him. "Harvard morgue case" would be an alternate name, although "Harvard morgue scandal" seems to be the most common phrase used in the media. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comment i agree your logic but this needs WP:NDESC title 'Harvard morgue scandal' feels headliney—blindlynx 18:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm ambivalent about that specific title. That's why I suggested "Harvard morgue case" may also work.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 23:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  i'd prefer that if it's all the same to you —blindlynx 23:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Should not be a BLP per WP:BLP1E. Have no specific problem with the proposed title, we have a whole Category:Scandals. AusLondonder (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.