This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles
What's the point of this article, beyond its service as a simple advertisement for this company? This "Dougbedell" user has contributed nothing to Wikipedia except this single article. --Skidoo (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonetheless, I think the firm is legitimately notable and that the article much more balanced now. Tim Pierce (talk) 19:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't the subject supposed to be covered extensively in multiple reliable sources in order to be considered Notable? This article has three references, two of which are the company's website. The other reference simply points to a directory type listing on law.com. Not sure how that counts as Notable per WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevechoyster (talk • contribs) 19:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
