Talk:Hazelden Foundation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Non-Profit' is a tax status; Hazelden makes billions, and is ran by millionaires selling the "FREE" 12-Step religious AA/NA cults. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:4701:A000:186E:E7FF:3514:5658 (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC) There is not reason to censor the list of famous people who have been to Hazelden. Most have publicly admitted that they went to Hazelden and are proud of the fact that they sought help.[reply]

In the History section, who is Carroll? Need full i.d. on first reference. Wrightelz (talk) 21:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)wrightelz[reply]

While I would agree that many famous people have been open about the fact they have sought treatment for addiction - it is less frequent that they will identify the facility they went to. Usually it is the media that speculates where they are and what they are there for. I would think that since anonymity is a pivotal component of the recovery process, it is probably best to not identify any specific people who have been there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sefinke (talk • contribs) 18:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ad[edit]

The article appears to be written by a PR person or off a website. The two page timeline of every event at this facility appears unencyclopedic as well. --71.110.67.204 (talk) 00:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed a large paste of copyrighted text from http://www.hazelden.org/web/public/history.page. Empty Buffer (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

publishing[edit]

they also publish a massive amount of addiction- and treatment-related materials. PurpleChez (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]