Talk:Head of the Ohio

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles

To-do list:

Featured Articles:

Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status.
1. Get article relisted to 'good article status'
2. Put through another round of peer review, see here
3. Nominate for featured status
Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave

Stubs: see here..

Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them.
Expand stubs to at least start class.

Image requests: see here..
Article requests: see here..

Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates)

Document FISA database errors

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Pittsburgh[edit]

The University of Pittsburgh template is here, but there is no mention of it in the article. More information needed, especially if an inline citation is available. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template...[edit]

Magio, as per WP:BRD, can you explain why you wish to apply the template to the external links? As per WP:External, such templates are strictly optional, and seem to be adding no value here. I'd be grateful if you sought consensus first, rather than continuing to edit-war. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per {{official website}} this is preferred. It is in the documentation Please undo your edit. Thanks Magioladitis (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the template helps cpmpare data with wikidata. Undoing the edit adds no value and instead makes data comparison more difficult. Magioladitis (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe we should use the template in order to have same data in other wikipedi projects and wikidata. Still i am also ok if we use the template only for comparison. What are your arguments for opposing the change? Magioladitis (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see that "preference" in the documentation you've linked to Magio; rather, WP:External says clearly that the "use of the template {{official website}} is optional." Hchc2009 (talk) 07:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hchc2009 Per documentation "Prefer using this template instead of adding direct urls in the External links section." Apart from that since we have two ways to do the same thig and the one has some advantages and is "optional" and not "deprecated" so I see no reason not to do it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still not seeing it on the link you've given ({{official website}})... Hchc2009 (talk) 08:46, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hchc2009 Here: Template:Official_website/doc. It refers to th External links section only. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Found it. Adding it to an obscure documentation page with no wider discussion, in contradiction to the main guideline page, clearly doesn't work as a way of generating cross-wiki consensus. If you want to do mass changes on this basis, my strong advice is to start a conversation at the village pump, and then once you've achieved consensus there, alter WP:External. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Hchc2009 Changing the text of documentation while in conflict is not nice you know. I reverted you. The discussion was mainly on the standardisation. The wikidata part is optional. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]