Talk:Healthcare in Pakistan

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 May 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Saherdaredia.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anikakalra.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

There is no point to this page. Unless someone wants to come in and make it something worth reading, it should be merged with "Pakitstan" or deleted. Personally, I prefer the latter.

Merge from Sexually transmitted infections in Pakistan[edit]

I have merged in the content of this article, per the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexually Transmitted Infections In Pakistan. I've removed a few of its links which appeared entirely irrelevant. A much longer but unreferenced version exists here: [1]. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me somebody wrote this page with a vengeance. When you read it, it sounds more like an essay on the topic of "Poor Health Conditions in Pakistan" , rather than giving information on health care system in Pakistan. BIASED! Digimanpk (talk) 19:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://paktribune.com/news/print.php?id=156327 http://gis.emro.who.int/HealthSystemObservatory/PDF/Pakistan/Health%20status%20and%20demographics.pdf. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Misarxist 17:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Healthcare in Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061020190457/http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/ministries/index.jsp?MinID=22&cPath=251 to http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/ministries/index.jsp?MinID=22&cPath=251

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My view base on the suggestion[edit]

Before writing this article (Transparent Hands Foundation), I went through the article you suggested to be merged with careful, and noticed that it is not expected to be merged since the draft article is highly independent and has nothing to do with government in rendering the voluntary services of its. Therefore, by allowing this article being itself, it will give more specifications on the existing of the foundation which improves and expands the contents of information resources on wikipedia. The main aim of wikipidia is to create easy access to information needs of different individuals at the right time. Thank you. Abubakar Balarabe (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overview of comments[edit]

I firstly start by thanking the experienced editors who shared their opinions over the article draft I have proposed. Indeed, every thing in the world is bound with critism which leads to creative thinking on the one that is critised and others. I am very happy that Wikipidia has many more policies especially fair hearing which gives everyone freedom to express his or her thoughts provided that it is not a personal interest, this has really cleared away my otherwise thinking about the foundation as a new contributor and I am very happy for the opinions of yours.

After going step by step through the opinions of respected colleagues of mine, in each comment, I learned many things and I am very happy for that.

Moreover, after reading some basic guidelines and policies for wikipidia, I noticed that many things should not have been done without having the knowledge of it's. I accepted whatever critisms you made regarding to this newly proposed draft.

In addition, as I proposed the draft article (Transparent Hands Foundation) which led to controversies, dissatisfactions and others. Please, I propose that it should be deleted completely.

                          Advice

I advise the editor who releted the action as "Vengeance" to be nutral in whatever he or she does, this is not an opinion, it sounds like an attack, so, be always aspiring good things to others, I don't use my personal interest in hurting others especially in wikipidia which is not founded purposely for that. Thank you very much. Abubakar Balarabe. Abubakar Balarabe (talk) 07:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]