Talk:Hearts and Minds (Vietnam War)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not neutral[edit]

This article definitely does NOT meet WP's standards for NPOV. --Andrew Phelps 08:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's a little over the top. I also note that the phrase is still in use by Americans (e.g. referring to Iraq, Afghanistan etc.) heqs 09:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't normally comment on Wikipedia articles, but this one stuck out like a sore thumb. The first two paragraphs would chill Orwell's bones. I don't claim NPOV for what is arguably a propaganda term, so I haven't made any edits. Can someone change this article and deal with how this policy was carried out in Vietnam using facts instead of romantic ideals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.184.16 (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the opening paragraph of this entry is offensively ridiculous and biased. also, too, lbj didn't coin the term, the brits did in malaya during the emergency a decade before lbj. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.228.55 (talk) 01:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adams?[edit]

What's the basis of saying LBJ was probably referencing John Adams? "Hearts and minds" was originally a biblical expression and I'd guess it's the more likely referent.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hearts and Minds (Vietnam War). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]