Talk:Helsinki Accords

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I am surprised that there is no Finnish-language version of this article. – Kaihsu 14:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness, Finnish is a really hard language. --NEMT (talk) 19:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of information section is suspiciously single-American source referenced.[edit]

Self-explanatory - a single American uni-released statement/paper that starts with ; "The Soviet Union began to jam Western radio broadcasts to the Soviet Union in 1948.1 Jamming 2 has continued to be a problem since then," ...is self-exhibitive of bias.

how about some quotes from the discussions themselves, the meeting notes / both side's statements on the same issues, etc. 120.21.158.0 (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reception and impact section, infers Helsinki Watch as independent.[edit]

Considering especially in hindsight (at least), of the clear bias historically, and therefore dis-ingenuous nature of the PRIVATE/not-fully-disclosing nature of the fund and org. , it should be described as ; CLAIMED-independent, or puported-as, or something similar.

not simply, 'independent" - that infers direct-adjective attribution/nature. 120.21.158.0 (talk) 10:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]