Talk:Hemp in Kentucky/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 16:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality (prose is clear and concise, without exceeding quotations, or spelling and grammar errors):

   B. MoS compliance (included, but not limited to: lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists):

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):

   Some citations are not placed where they should be and sometimes they are placed where they shouldn't be

   C. No original research:

   D. No copyright violations:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAN process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):

6. Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?

   A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Resolved comments from Tbhotch

;Lead "during the 19th and 20th century." -> centuries "Kentucky was responsible for 3/4" -> Per MOS:FRAC it should be spelled-out "hemp fiber production. Hemp production" -> Reword it, as it sounds redundant "decline after WWI" -> After World War I Link cash crop cannabis sativa -> cannabis sativa, and link it "a Schedule 1" -> a Schedule I "In 2014, federal law under the Agricultural Act of 2014" -> The year is already given No need a source in the lead  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Early cultivation "during the 19th and 20th century." -> same as lead "brought new seeds to the state from Asia" -> None of the sources mentions Asia. Correct me if I'm wrong "Kentucky was responsible for 3/4" -> same as lead USDA -> U.S Department of Agriculture "The WWII effort is documented in the USDA film Hemp for Victory .[14]:1" -> The source does not mention this  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Decline and criminalization "a decline after World War I. The decline" -> decline is reduntant "cannabis" -> cannabis THC -> tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) I don't get what source 19 is citing "on hemp, "To the federal" -> "on hemp, "[t]o the federal" Link Newsweek "all cannabis sativa" -> "all cannabis sativa"  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Partial re-legalization [8][23][24][25] ... [26][27][28][29] ... [30][31][32][33][34] -> refer to WP:CITEKILL "six other states including Indiana, Nebraska, New York, and Virginia" -> Those are four Link University of Kentucky May, 2014 -> May 2014 "the Drug Enforcement Administration" -> the DEA Link Harrison County, Kentucky  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Legal status the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) -> THC schedule I controlled substance is overlinked THC is overlinked Merge paragraph 1 and 2  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Production Link Cynthiana, KY March, 2016 -> March 2016 20,000 pounds -> 20,000 lbs  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Documentary It does not seem to be part of the production itself A summary about the plot of Harvesting Liberty can be included  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Further reading West is missing the publisher; inconsistency with dates (2013-08-19) Janet Patton -> Patton, Jannet; Lexington where? Matt Markgraf -> Markgraf, Matt; link Murray, Kentucky Bill Kemp -> Kemp, Bill; link Bloomington-Normal, Illinois  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Bibliography Link Random House Link Alexandria, Virginia Link University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law Link University of Missouri–Kansas City (UMKC) Link University of Colorado Law School (it does not go in italics) Link University of California Press Inconsistency with dates (1 September 2013)  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Decline and criminalization The Drug Enforcement Administration -> The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) It is missing a wikilink See also Hemp Farming Act of 2018 seems more relevant for the article than for a see also  Done ☆ Bri (talk) Will it be excluded? © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC) Yes, we already mention 2018 United States farm bill which basically subsumed the standalone hemp act by incorporating it. ☆ Bri (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC) Citations One dead link; several links need to be updated[1] 1: Ethan Jacobs -> Jacobs, Ethan; it is missing |accessdate= 3: No reason to be in italics; Source 3 goes nowhere 4: This archive does nothing. For the real link, you need to do an explanation of what to do with the database. Also , Kentucky Historical Marker Database does not require italics 7: No reason to be in italics;

Thank you for your review. It will take me some time to do everything (and I may have some help from a related project). For now I've made the changes to the lede as suggested. Is it permitted to add checkmarks to the review section? ☆ Bri (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, you can. Although I've collapsed what has been done. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 23:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

@Tbhotch: I hope I got all the citation cleanups, there were quite a few and the numbering changed since your review. I hope that accessdate isn't required for Google Books, but if it is I will add those. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

For the Google Books, as {{cite book}} does not require the parameter I don't think it is needed. As I have no other concern about the article I pass its GA nomination. Good work. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 19:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.