Talk:Henry Brewster Stanton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Henry Brewster Stanton & Women's Rights[edit]

Please provide source information for HBS & his support of women's rights. To my knowledge, one of his wife's greater disappointments was that they disagreed over female suffrage and other rights for women, as did ECS and her father, Daniel Cady. HBS declined to participate in the 1st Womens Rights Convention in Seneca Falls, NY, much to ECS's disappointment. (I believe Lucretia Mott's husband chaired the convention, and ECS had hoped for similar support from her husband, which apparently was not forthcoming.) With all this in mind, I greatly question the assertion that Henry Brewster Stanton was a supporter of women's rights in any but superficial measures. Jancarhart 23:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Henry Brewster Stanton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]