Talk:Hippocampal prosthesis

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Older comments[edit]

I am a neuroscientist and expert in the field - Wikipedia has this article tagged as needing the attention of an expert - what is the issue with this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeakerTR (talk • contribs) 04:35, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I proposed Prosthetic Neuronal Memory Silicon Chips be merged into Hippocampal prosthesis, they are essentially the same thing, and also some of the text is overlapping (which also needs considerable attention). Lophostrix (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree that Prosthetic Neuronal Memory Silicon Chips be merged into Hippocampal prosthesis. Prosthetic Neuronal Memory Silicon Chips are not only essentially the same thing as a hippocampal prostheses, they are indeed an example of a hippocampal prosthesis. Moreover, Prosthetic Neuronal Memory Silicon Chips are the same example of a hippocampal prosthesis, designed by Theodore Berger, that is discussed in this article. Philgalinsky (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2016‎

I don't have an opinion about that, but your comment confused me because it copied the time and date of the comment above it -- it was hard to recognize as a new comment. I have fixed the date, but note for the future that if you sign a talk page message by typing ~~~~ at the end, the correct time and date will be inserted automatically. Best regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with merge; now

Done Klbrain (talk) 22:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]